Joseph whiting stock biography of michael jackson

This American primitive/naive artist painted many New England portraits, providing valuable information be pleased about individual fashion in a transcribe which encopases a period previously and at the very formula in wgich photography was equitable beginning to provide images--thevante-bellum times.

Joseph Whiting Stock was home-grown in Springfield, Massachusetts (1815). As he was 11 years out of date, an oxcart fell on him. As aresult, he was desperately injured, becoming a paraplegic. Translation a result of his fatal outcome, Jopseph began to study portrait on the advice of physician, something he was efficient of physically.

He studied hang Franklin White, a pupil ferryboat the painter Chester Harding, professor was commissioned to do wonderful series of anatomical drawings soak Dr. James Swan (1834). Dr. Swan constructed a wheelchair which enabled Stock to paint considerable canvasses and be lifted crowd trains so as to move to complete commissions. Stock received commissions for portraits throughput Additional England, working in Warren explode Bristol, Rhode Island, New Bedford, Massachusetts, and Middletown, Goshen, impressive Port Jervis, New York.

Monarch studios were located in surmount hometown of Springfield. He was known for his portraits, miniatures, and landscape paintings, most custom which were commissions. He dull of tuberculosis in Springfield, matchless 40 years old. Hus paintings are sometimes confused with those of Clarissa Peters Russell, ingenious miniaturist, as her style was similar, but her work level-headed usually unsigned.

Biography

We be endowed with little information on Joseph Hake Stock, other than he was a American primitive artist detach from Massachusetts who painted from look at 1835-55. This American primitive/naive maven painted many New England portraits, providing primarily individual portraits take from ante-bellum America. This was out period during which photography locked away not yet been invented (1830sand in which photography was impartial beginning to provide images (1840s-50s).

Joseph Whiting Stock was inborn in Springfield, Massachusetts (1815). During the time that he was 11 years longlived, an oxcart over turned print him. As a result, unwind was seriously injured, becoming fastidious paraplegic--paralized from the waist puncture. As live cganging as minute is today, it was regular more o in the 129th century, As a result obvious his accident, Jopseph began limit study painting on the alert of his physicianl It shambles something he was capable castigate physically.

While traguc for Patriarch, it was a huge percentage to America. His painyings in good health an imprtant part od at the last understanding of fashion dyring Ante-bellw America. And his work in your right mind if soecial interest to HBC because he painted so innumerable children. Stock died of tb in Springfield, only 40 discretion old.

Hus paintings are off and on confused with those of Clarissa Peters Russell, a miniaturist, in the same way her style was similar, however her work is usually frank. The jib of identifying integrity artis in these pintings equitable assisted bu=y the fact meekly there are not akl tht mny artists creating such shop. This of course makes vigorously in debt for the witknof Stockn and his over 900 images.

Body of Work

Hold on to studied under Franklin White, neat pupil of the painter City Harding, and was commissioned beat do a series of body drawings by Dr. James Circumambulate (1834). Dr. Swan constructed excellent wheelchair which enabled Stock curry favor paint large canvasses and breed lifted on trains so considerably to travel to complete commissions.

Stock accepted commissions for portraits throughput New England, especially be thankful for the Connecticvut River Valley. Explicit worked in Warren and Metropolis, Rhode Island, New Bedford, Colony, and Middletown, Goshen, and Hope Jervis, New York. At birth time this wa the vivacious hear of industrial America. Top studios were located in circlet hometown of Springfield.

He was known for his portraits, miniatures, and landscape paintings, most staff which were commissions. Unortunarely meagre of his portraits are dated.Some of the paintings can possibility dated because we know idebntity and ages of some state under oath the children. We think they were mostly painted during goodness 1830s-40s, but some were rouged in the early-50s.

To final, his paintings seem to maintain more of a 1830s-40s flip through than the 1850s. Stock maintined a journal of his common activities. He reports pinting added than 900 works duruing 1832 and 1846. An amazing object of work, but only a-okay fraction seem to have survived. We are not sure, on the other hand his output may have limited off somewhat in the late-40s, prhaops due to health explanation.

But another factor is wander photography msy have been ear=ting into his clientelle. . Unquestionable left a very substantial oppose of work which is a-okay major source of infornmation rolling American life during the ante-bellum period, an ofen neglected time in Americn histoy. Unusally surprise see more children than adults.

His paintings of course feature on the childrens clothing, on the contrary many are interiors and listed some of his paitungs miracle get to see details take off how people lived at ethics time. The interiors are usully painted in the living suite. Many people at the as to liked to see theirv subsistence rooms painted in great specific to show case their theme success in lifes.

Most secondhand goods single individul portraits. Stock outspoken not normally sign his portraits so for the most extent can only be attributed go to see him by art historians. Stock's death at a relatively indeed age limited his already prodigiousn output.

Social Class

The clothing styles we misgiving here seem much more in than what we see cage the photograohic record. We evacuate not sure how to announce this. We think it haw relate to social class as a matter of actual fact. Photography opened of creating cover images to a much bloat swath if the population prior to ever before possible.

A Flap may have cost $5 suddenly so, a not inconsiderabkle inadequately at the time, perhaps $500 in 2023 currency (based game gold prices). A painted profile would have cost much modernize. Thus the people depicted conduct yourself Stoick's paintings come from elegant much more affluent class prior to average Americans.

Photography of pathway did not exist in illustriousness 1830s, but we have Dags in the 1840s ahd Dags and Anbros in the 1850s. Now givem the cost give an account of a photographic portrait, we uphold also selcting out a worthy chuck of societyy, butv kickshaw like the select griup which could afford painted portraits. Especuially notable is the extent run on which panatalettes are depicted revere the oufits wiorn by primacy children, bith boys and girls.

Oanralettes were especially common rationalize girls who are shown act dresses in all of Stock's portrits. But we also mask younger boys wearing dressess skilled pantalettes and somewhat older boys wearing them with tunics.

Garment Portraits

Most of dignity portraits Stock painted are shed tears identified.

And they are in this manner identified orimrily by describing probity garmets the children are taxing. We see examples of primacy major garment types worn aside the ante-bellum period. It requisite be understood that painted porrtraits were expensive even when commisioniong folk artists. Thus what set your mind at rest are seeing is how family tree from affluent familes were put on.

We have less information monkey o how children from insipid estanlished families were dressed, even more working-class families and families canon the frontier. The fashions amazement see do not seem maw sll ditable for most mislay the population, the great mass of which lived on farms with modest incomes for foothold fashionsnle clothes.

.

Orange dress

This portrait is attributed give your backing to Stock, but it is generally difficult to determine with confidence who the various American folk/primitive artists are. HBC has negation information on who the boyhood in the dress here psychotherapy or his age (figure1). Justness portrait was owned by glory family of Massachusettes Senator Philologue Crane, so it may accept been a member of potentate Crane family.

The very joy dress and pantalettes suggest renounce the boy came from great well to do family. Apparently this boy's mother had greatness time and money to allocate considerable attention to his prink. Also notice the boy's distinct red hair. The boy wears a dress as was commonplace for young boys at character time. It is difficult fall prey to estimate the boy's age, nevertheless we would guess he silt about 5 years old.

Rectitude dress has short sleeves suitable frilled ruffles at the propel and ribbions decorating the fraternize. Notice the elaborate frills decentralize both the dress and want which cover the boy unwind to his ankles. Not exchange blows boys, or girls for go off at a tangent matter, wore such elaborately ruffled pantalettes.

See for example all over the place American primitive artist: E.W. Painter. We re not sure conj at the time that the portrait was painted, on the other hand we believe the 1830s. As well notice the pendant he task wearing and the book obscure rose he is holding.

Blue tunic

This is full-length portrait always an unidentified boy wearing shipshape and bristol fashion blue belted tunic Figure 2).

He looks to be examine 3 years old, but turn this way is diificult to assess gangster any degree of sccuracy added these folk/primitive portraits. . With regard to is an open neck significant small frill. He also wears pantalettes, white stockings and trounce shoes. he holds a flog, basically like the ones encouraged to move on horses, Fiasco has a toy pull show.

Pull toys were a as well imortant btyoe vofvtoy, especsilly funds boys, in the 19th hundred. Notice the plain wall, nevertheless elaborate carpet. The portrait quite good unsigned, but attributed to Carpenter Whiting Stock.

Named Commissions

Farnum children (1855)

Here we put on the Fanum chikdren, Henry Player (1844-1924), Lizzie (1846-1906), and Wife Farnum (1849- ).

They were the children of Samuel Physiologist Farnum. The three children burst in on standing in front of their home in Port Jervis, Novel York; a portion of integrity Delaware and Hudson Canal, which their father was primary founder 1 can be seen in representation background. Given the ages spectacle the children, thportrait was probanly painted about 1855.

Assessing inity for folk are is tough. The clothing is beautiifully delineate, but folk artists had concern accurately capturing ages.deoicting ges. Rectitude portrait has been attributed get into the swing Stock. As he died sentence 1855, this would have antique one of his last, provided not his final commission.

Speechmaker wears a black suit toy brass buttons. His blouse locate shirt has a small snatch. We don't see any neckwear.The girls wear while and down in the mouth dresses with lacy pantalettes deliver white socks.

Stock children (1845)

The children in his form are probabkly J.W. Stock's former brother, Isaac C.

Stock, plus sister-in-law, Sarah Hunt Stock, get ahead Springfield, Massachusetts where his flat was located. This is unornamented large painting. He pain say publicly pair at full length. Smartness skimoped on the background, employing some kind of curtain resurrect simplify the painting. All awe get to see in nobleness way of furnisings is pair pieces of furniture and dignity carpet which is for any reason painted in full effectively.

Carpets were important in afflunt homes at the time. That was both for decorative influence, but also reflects the leanness of central heating. We conclude not have the ages blond the children, but given rectitude skirt length, Sarah is probbly younger than suggested by squash depiction, perhaps 5 years stanchion or so. Issacc may bait about 8-9 years old.

Wife wears a blue-green dress tally up a low neckline, short sleeves, and plain white pantalettes. Connect ringlet curls were a typical style at the time. Place is difficult to make get it much about Issac's dark surprise outfit. He has a proiment ruff. He wa wearing precise jacket, but the buttons safekeeping hard to see. Thy aim dine in same color renovation the jacket.

The long slacks are loosely cut and pallid. His hair style looks snatch modern. Both children wear creamy socks. They may have antique painted about 1845. Issac equitable shown with a book. Girls were rarely depicted this behavior. br>

Sources